Social media is nonstop mental chatter. Users post fragments to confirm existence. Feeds flow. In this environment, what you write is governed by how you write.
The Style
An experiment. Simple constraints:
End sentences with assertions. No "I think" or "maybe."
One idea, one sentence.
If one word works, use one word.
Cut filler.
Simple rules. Radical effects.
What Happened
Assertive endings reject vague impressions. "I'm tired" can't carry the weight of assertion. The mind searches for content worth asserting.
Result:
Experience sharing → knowledge extraction
"Went to a café" → "This café has eight power outlets"
"Felt happy" → "Recognition and achievement activate different circuits"
Style steered output from egophoric to epistemic.
Why This Works
Assertion forces self-verification. Writing "X is Y" triggers "Can I actually claim this?" If not, restructure or delete.
Brevity compounds the effect. Cutting reveals the core. No core, no post. The style filters what deserves posting.
English Application
These principles work in English. Better, even.
Japanese-to-English translation bloats from residual politeness and literal structure. Assertive compression fixes this:
"I think that..." → cut
"It seems to me that..." → cut
"I would say that..." → cut
What remains: verbs and nouns.
Examples:
Character limits make this compression practical.
Observed Effects
Sustained posting in this style produced changes:
Content consumed as presence, not information. ("test" alone got reposted.)
Official accounts that never followed back started following.
Personal posting standards rose.
Point two matters most. A follow-back signals "worth tracking." The shift to epistemic output changed positioning.
Conclusion
Style shapes thought. This is weak Sapir-Whorf operating at output level.
Adopt assertion, seek assertion-worthy content. Adopt brevity, keep only the core. Constraints direct quality.
Change how you write, change what you write. Change what you write, change who you become.
Style choice is cognitive choice.